- The Conservative Fund Canada,
Douglas M. Finley,
Irving Gerstein,
Michael Donison and
Susan J. Kehoe,
Between November 1st, 2005 and January 23rd, 2006, in the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario and elsewhere in Canada, did wilfully incur election expenses in relation to the 39th federal general election that exceeded the maximum of $18, 278, 278.64 for the Conservative Party of Canada, contrary to Section 423 (1) of the Canada Elections Act and did thereby commit an offence punishable on summary conviction contrary to Sections 497 (3) (g) and 500 (5) (a) of the said Act.
- The Conservative Party of Canada,
Between November 1st, 2005 and January 23rd, 2006, in the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario and elsewhere in Canada, being a registered party whose chief agent, the Conservative Fund Canada, did wilfully incur election expenses in relation to the 39th federal general election that exceeded the maximum of $18, 278, 278.64 for the Conservative Party of Canada, contrary to Sections 423 (1) and 497 (3) (g) of the Canada Elections Act is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction contrary to Section 507 of the said Act.
- The Conservative Fund Canada and
Irving Gerstein,
Between January 23rd, 2006 and December 18th, 2006, in the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario, did provide the Chief Electoral Officer with a return on the general election expenses of the Conservative Party of Canada, in relation to the 39th federal general election, that they knew or ought reasonably to have known contained a materially false or misleading statement, namely that all election expenses in respect of the 39th federal general election had been properly recorded, contrary to Section 431 (a) of the Canada Elections Act and did thereby commit an offence punishable on summary conviction contrary to Sections 497 (3) (m) (ii) and 500 (5) (a) of the said Act.
- The Conservative Party of Canada,
Between January 23rd, 2006 and December 18th, 2006, in the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario, being a registered party whose chief agent, the Conservative Fund Canada, did provide the Chief Electoral Officer with a return on its general election expenses, in relation to the 39th federal general election, that the Conservative Fund Canada knew or ought reasonably to have known contained a materially false or misleading statement, namely that all election expenses in respect of the 39th federal general election had been properly recorded, contrary to Sections 431 (a) and 497 (3) (m) (ii) of the Canada Elections Act is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction contrary to Section 507 of the said Act.
Hey Canada the Conservatives broke the LAW.
They broke the law, they broke the law, they broke the law, they broke the law.
So the prison zealots - who so wish for American justice and their constitution - no second chance kinda gang - broke the law.
The holier than thou - nice neat right wing Harperites - punishment first and maybe rehabilitation second want us Canadians to allow them to rehabilitate first. No you will be punished first. That means we throw them out of office and they can run again once they have served their time out of office. And we Canadians think that harsher penalties for first time offenders might thwart other parties from doing the same thing. So let's say we punish them for at least two terms out of office.
These hypocritical self-serving cheaters need to be sent their own message.
Is there a problem with media on the Hill? Must be because they have not got the guts to say what Canadians are thinking. They keep skirting the real issue by entertaining Conservative talking heads with speaking notes repeating over and over "I have here in my hand the NDP...I have here in my hand the Liberal..." so what?
Who is charged with violating the Canada Elections Act? Please refer to the beginning of this post.
Are the Conservatives in power? Yes - so they must be held to the highest accountability level.
I expect my MP's from Newfoundland and Labrador to verbally hammer these people in the HOC until they leave their seats in shame. I also expect the same from my public broadcaster.
3 comments:
Maybe the CONs will find a few more young staffers to throw under the bus to take the blame.
It seems 35-40% (if you believe the polls) of Canadians are ok with this type of scumbag politics.
The main stream media can't be depended on to press any issue to completion.
I am still waiting on answers to who in our government and military leadership allowed the transfers of Afghan detainees to probable torture. I guess possible warcrimes aren't sexy enough to warrant continuing coverage and investigation. There were CON MPs exposed for 'misleading' parliament on that issue too.
Like you Brent I also am waiting for answers on possible war crime atrocities that may have occured .If we are experiencing a "media bias", it is a two-way street . The general public is gullible and easily distracted.A for instance , this Moammar Gadhafi and Charlie Sheen fiasco ,folks tend to see everything as reality TV .The two issues are treated as though they are of equal importance .
Is it the interest of the media to pander to sitting governments , and in the case of CBC , are they saving their own skin , in that they are funded by public monies doled out by that very government ?
Whatever is happening ,it appears that we may well be facing the erosion of social integrity .
Sue,
And you think the Williams supported Liberal MPs are going to speak up? Not on your life. Time to get them all out and vote in our own NL MPs.
REAL CHANGE FOR A CHANGE.
Wayne R. Bennett
NL Independent Candidate
Humber - St. Barbe -Baie Verte
Post a Comment