I am disappointed in Paul - he is a new member and was not involved in setting the rules of the IEC in 03-04.
He should not have to pay back his $2875 allowance top-up - what Paul needed to explain is how much was left when Tom Lush left.
Did Tom disproportionately deplete that allowance by election October - 2003?
In order for this to be really corrected the people need the information. Tell us Paul what was in your allowance when you took office?
By saying that he would not have taken it - he is blindly following the spin the Premier is applying. The House of Assembly remains an independent body and should not be dictated to by the Premier or government.
No comments:
Post a Comment