Trudeau puts one region above another - That's what the Conservative Ad says.
Who said the following?
"There is a dependence in the region that breeds a culture of defeatism"
Oh yeah that's right - Mr. Harper - about Atlantic Canada
He just puts one region under the rest.
On that basis I would think Mr. Harper will vote for Trudeau.
I think the difference is Harper said this when he was the leader of Canada's Opposition.
So Atlantic Canada lets practice defeatism - Defeat Harper in every Atlantic Canadian seat.
Next up - what did Harper say in his younger political career?
Showing posts with label New Brunswick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Brunswick. Show all posts
Monday, April 29, 2013
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Regional Cooperation = Robbing Newfoundland and Labrador
The word "regional" flows from the lips of our provincial Tories much too loosely.
First of all I must remind each and every one of you accepting a salary from us and stating that for that salary you represent us - that your job is NOT regional growth.
Nova Scotia - New Brunswick - Prince Edward Island and Quebec "region' have their own politicians as well as federal representatives.
Regional to us has meant - the giveaway of the Upper Churchill, the giveaway of fisheries stocks, the giveaway of our people, the giveaway of our secondary processing of minerals, and the giveaway of refining for our top grade oil.
Regional cooperation has not returned resources and people from other provinces including the "region".
We have sent our people to Alberta, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island for work. What do they do? Well they process and refine fish, oil, gas, and minerals in these provinces.
We have sent 5000 MW's of power to Quebec at outrageous prices and in return they have created tens of thousands of jobs that we cannot qualify for.
We do not have the transportation infrastructure that other provinces in our region do. In fact our transportation has seen the elimination of railway, inadequate ferry service to Canada, and inadequate search and rescue assets.
We do not have the population growth and size of other provinces and yet we continue to export raw resources and minerals.
Now they want cooperation in order they may take even more hydro resources. We will subsidize power going to Nova Scotia. Why? They (Ottawa included) feel that Muskrat Falls is a good project so we can do OUR SHARE in the reduction of greenhouse gasses. Listen up - the 5000 MW's 5 BILLION Watts that we send from the Upper Churchill is the largest per-capita contribution to greening up in Canada. It is now time to do what we do for us.
We cannot be a "have province" in a region of "have-nots" that have more jobs, people, and infrastructure that we do. Where is our equivalent population growth or where is the lowering of our average age?
How about our cooperation on our fisheries resources?
What did we ultimately get in return? What did we give up? What other provinces benefited from the giveaway of fish stocks to foreign nations? How many communities have we lost?
Tourism numbers - how many tourists in the other provinces in our region? How many do we see?
Regional cooperation has always been a one way benefit and it has not been for us.
Tell me - what have we received from our historic cooperation (giveaway) of our resources? Nothing other than loss of communities, resources, and people.
Then there is Labrador - what can I say? Missing one gold plated highway, search and rescue resources, two smelters, four refineries, and hydro power for all communities.
First of all I must remind each and every one of you accepting a salary from us and stating that for that salary you represent us - that your job is NOT regional growth.
Nova Scotia - New Brunswick - Prince Edward Island and Quebec "region' have their own politicians as well as federal representatives.
Regional to us has meant - the giveaway of the Upper Churchill, the giveaway of fisheries stocks, the giveaway of our people, the giveaway of our secondary processing of minerals, and the giveaway of refining for our top grade oil.
Regional cooperation has not returned resources and people from other provinces including the "region".
We have sent our people to Alberta, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island for work. What do they do? Well they process and refine fish, oil, gas, and minerals in these provinces.
We have sent 5000 MW's of power to Quebec at outrageous prices and in return they have created tens of thousands of jobs that we cannot qualify for.
We do not have the transportation infrastructure that other provinces in our region do. In fact our transportation has seen the elimination of railway, inadequate ferry service to Canada, and inadequate search and rescue assets.
We do not have the population growth and size of other provinces and yet we continue to export raw resources and minerals.
Now they want cooperation in order they may take even more hydro resources. We will subsidize power going to Nova Scotia. Why? They (Ottawa included) feel that Muskrat Falls is a good project so we can do OUR SHARE in the reduction of greenhouse gasses. Listen up - the 5000 MW's 5 BILLION Watts that we send from the Upper Churchill is the largest per-capita contribution to greening up in Canada. It is now time to do what we do for us.
We cannot be a "have province" in a region of "have-nots" that have more jobs, people, and infrastructure that we do. Where is our equivalent population growth or where is the lowering of our average age?
How about our cooperation on our fisheries resources?
What did we ultimately get in return? What did we give up? What other provinces benefited from the giveaway of fish stocks to foreign nations? How many communities have we lost?
Tourism numbers - how many tourists in the other provinces in our region? How many do we see?
Regional cooperation has always been a one way benefit and it has not been for us.
Tell me - what have we received from our historic cooperation (giveaway) of our resources? Nothing other than loss of communities, resources, and people.
Then there is Labrador - what can I say? Missing one gold plated highway, search and rescue resources, two smelters, four refineries, and hydro power for all communities.
Thursday, August 02, 2012
Harper Enemy of the State? Premiers must take Action
I always begin my posts on the Prime Minister by reminding the reader that Stephen Harper is a liar. No doubt that causes problems in our nation - not the least of which is setting a very bad example for young Canadians.
Now our "leader" is threatening our country. How? Well this man who sits atop the Canadian political heap is shovelling sh-t (figuratively speaking) and tossing it on the masses below.
Once again this ne'er-do-well is saying no to yet another First Ministers meeting.
Canada consists of provinces and territories and under confederation agree to a federal presence in areas of joint service delivery, national security, and to a certain degree matters of law. Under such terms provinces and territories agree to a federal taxation base provided by personal and corporate interests. Considering the monies raised to allow a country to exist are garnered from these sources - it is necessary and only reasonable that these parties are directly involved in the allocation of those funds.
Harper's insistence on running a one-man state and his determination to design Canada in his vision continues to jeopardize both the national economy and sovereignty. Make no mistake the international corporate giants do have his ear - while the electorate does not. This is a recipe for disaster. Harper's obvious desire to be a CEO should be achieved in private not public service.
The Premier's for their part are starting to wear some of the blame here. It is unacceptable to be ignored by the federal government and therefore the provinces and territories must take action to correct this problem. The whining of these individuals to the media has not and will not achieve regular meetings with Harper.
As Quebeckers go to the polls my instinct tells me that this is a real problem for Charest and will become a bigger problem as the dog days of summer continue to the fall. This in turn may cause additional and constitutional problems as we head into the winter of our discontent.
The people of Canada elect their respective provincial governments and they fully expect these politicians to represent their interests in the federation. If they fail in doing so - the people look to the media for proper questioning of the situation. I cannot think of anything more important in Canada right now than the state of communication, collaboration, and cooperation between the PMO and the Premier's. This means a first Ministers meeting must occur at least on an annual basis.
Currently the aloof Harper is winning the battle without having to raise a sword. This is not acceptable.
The Premiers, media, and federal MPs have the responsibility to deal with this situation or run the risk that Harper's spoiled honey will stick to them.
Now our "leader" is threatening our country. How? Well this man who sits atop the Canadian political heap is shovelling sh-t (figuratively speaking) and tossing it on the masses below.
Once again this ne'er-do-well is saying no to yet another First Ministers meeting.
Canada consists of provinces and territories and under confederation agree to a federal presence in areas of joint service delivery, national security, and to a certain degree matters of law. Under such terms provinces and territories agree to a federal taxation base provided by personal and corporate interests. Considering the monies raised to allow a country to exist are garnered from these sources - it is necessary and only reasonable that these parties are directly involved in the allocation of those funds.
Harper's insistence on running a one-man state and his determination to design Canada in his vision continues to jeopardize both the national economy and sovereignty. Make no mistake the international corporate giants do have his ear - while the electorate does not. This is a recipe for disaster. Harper's obvious desire to be a CEO should be achieved in private not public service.
The Premier's for their part are starting to wear some of the blame here. It is unacceptable to be ignored by the federal government and therefore the provinces and territories must take action to correct this problem. The whining of these individuals to the media has not and will not achieve regular meetings with Harper.
As Quebeckers go to the polls my instinct tells me that this is a real problem for Charest and will become a bigger problem as the dog days of summer continue to the fall. This in turn may cause additional and constitutional problems as we head into the winter of our discontent.
The people of Canada elect their respective provincial governments and they fully expect these politicians to represent their interests in the federation. If they fail in doing so - the people look to the media for proper questioning of the situation. I cannot think of anything more important in Canada right now than the state of communication, collaboration, and cooperation between the PMO and the Premier's. This means a first Ministers meeting must occur at least on an annual basis.
Currently the aloof Harper is winning the battle without having to raise a sword. This is not acceptable.
The Premiers, media, and federal MPs have the responsibility to deal with this situation or run the risk that Harper's spoiled honey will stick to them.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Now VOCM, Kathy Dunderdale, and Ed Martin want it all to go to Nova Scotia?
 | |
This is posted on top of the VOCM website today. I want to express that VOCM owned by NewCap is proudly supporting the bid by Irving for the multi-billion dollar federal contract for shipbuilding.
This is the same contract that Peter Kiewit and Sons pulled out of leaving Marystown without any hope of getting this work.
Please go the site that VOCM is supporting and read about the hopes and dreams of those in NS and NB in getting the work and being able to build a house and start a family in these provinces.
What is to become of Marystown and our people?
I have selected a few quotes below from the Nova Scotian website. For the full story CLICK HERE.
Workers hope ship comes in
Every week, Ryan Prendergast puts $10 into his lottery pool at the Halifax Shipyard. But these days, the 23-year-old sheet metal worker dreams of another big financial prize, one that could come from the federal government. “It means a secure job, a secure future. You can start a family, buy a house,” the Glace Bay native says of Ottawa’s $35-billion shipbuilding procurement plan.Married and with a baby on the way in November, he has almost finished his apprenticeship after 3½ years at the yard. “It’s definitely important to a lot of people — younger people, anyway,” the Cape Bretoner says during a break in a lunchroom. Such a long-term contract would also benefit older workers, many of whom are set to retire in the next five years or so, Prendergast says.
About 700 tradespeople are working at the yard, 250 of them apprentices. In all, the Halifax Shipyard has roughly 1,000 people at its waterfront complex.
A single mother, Morris is anxious to land long-term work. Because she has a three-year-old daughter, she’d prefer not to leave the province to find it. With so much riding on the contract, it’s usually the topic of conversation in the lunchroom, Morris says.
“I could see us hiring another 1,000 workers over the period of the contract, at its peak,” says Risser, whose father, brother and an uncle work at the shipyard. “You could see us hit levels that we’ve never seen before.”
About half the yard’s hands are between the ages of 19 and 35 and would benefit the most from having 30 years of contracts waiting, Risser says.
Having read above - how do you feel about your future. While we are at it - how about Ed Martin, Kathy Dunderdale, and VOCM all get together and pump the Lower Churchill project with Emera. That way we can send our industry, power, and people to that province.
Well done!
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Dunderdale essentially tells Canada - Take our final Best Renewable - it's all Yours!
Just sit back and think about this for a minute. All of a sudden the Lower Churchill is Canada's energy - a Maritime resource - an Emera project. All hands into it - all Premier's from the region taking a crack at it. All owning another of Newfoundland and Labrador's finest resources.
Answer this - what resources in any other province of Canada do we have our fingers into? Answer this - what resource project in any other province in Canada - are we in the middle of negotiations for?
This is - without a question - another instance where NL raw resources are being shipped out to and controlled by other provinces.
Answer this: if so many other jurisdictions are in such a need for this power - why is it we cannot attract industry to Labrador? Why can't we use our resources to attract industry looking for reliable, cost-effective, and renewable power - away from New England and the Maritimes. Why must we always - always give it away?
There are millionaires being made here - but it has nothing to do with the advancement of our people. This is a massive giveaway - worse than the Upper Churchill - and we are sitting by and letting it happen. Dunderdale and company are perpetrating the worse sell-off of natural resources in our history. Remember also - this is Danny's baby project and Kathy is the surrogate to give birth to it.
Where is "Liberal" Dean MacDonald? What's his take on this deal? He certainly had no problem condemning the Liberal government of Roger Grimes - where Yvonne Jones was a Minister - where is he now?
Below please find a couple of more comments on our resource:
If the only reason is to snub Quebec, and find an alternative way for a privately owned corporation Emera to sell electricity to the US, then I say hand off the public cookie jar and raise you own capital for the project, and Canadians have first choice on the natural resources.
Yur xenophobia's showing! NL's in Canada &Labrador hydro's important part of Cda's energy inventory That's why Feds must back it.
Now ask yourself again - what resource in any other province - do we have our fingers in or some control of?
They got the minerals, forest, fish, and the Upper Churchill - NOW - Dunderdale is going to turn over the Lower Churchill.
Stop this project - or we will have lost our future.
Answer this - what resources in any other province of Canada do we have our fingers into? Answer this - what resource project in any other province in Canada - are we in the middle of negotiations for?
This is - without a question - another instance where NL raw resources are being shipped out to and controlled by other provinces.
Answer this: if so many other jurisdictions are in such a need for this power - why is it we cannot attract industry to Labrador? Why can't we use our resources to attract industry looking for reliable, cost-effective, and renewable power - away from New England and the Maritimes. Why must we always - always give it away?
There are millionaires being made here - but it has nothing to do with the advancement of our people. This is a massive giveaway - worse than the Upper Churchill - and we are sitting by and letting it happen. Dunderdale and company are perpetrating the worse sell-off of natural resources in our history. Remember also - this is Danny's baby project and Kathy is the surrogate to give birth to it.
Where is "Liberal" Dean MacDonald? What's his take on this deal? He certainly had no problem condemning the Liberal government of Roger Grimes - where Yvonne Jones was a Minister - where is he now?
Below please find a couple of more comments on our resource:
If the only reason is to snub Quebec, and find an alternative way for a privately owned corporation Emera to sell electricity to the US, then I say hand off the public cookie jar and raise you own capital for the project, and Canadians have first choice on the natural resources.
Yur xenophobia's showing! NL's in Canada &Labrador hydro's important part of Cda's energy inventory That's why Feds must back it.
Now ask yourself again - what resource in any other province - do we have our fingers in or some control of?
They got the minerals, forest, fish, and the Upper Churchill - NOW - Dunderdale is going to turn over the Lower Churchill.
Stop this project - or we will have lost our future.
It is NOT Canada's or Maritime's Power - Dunderdale IS Selling Us Out
Below I have posted a couple of reader Comments on the CBC Canada webpage - the story they are commenting on is titled:
New England is just trying to hoodwink the maritimes, just as quebec hoodwinked Nfld. Take your time and get the correct and profitable price, Preferably for a short term contract, so we can gouge the snot out of them as they become more reliant. We can get our soft lumber settlement out of the crooks yet. We have to start taking care of our own backyard before we worry or get pressured by the arrogance of the yanks.
Comment 2
why don't the americans put their money where their mouths are!!! this is a canadian issue, and the yanks have no place sticking their two cents in. if they weren't such energy hogs, they wouldn't be in an energy crisis, would they?! our project, our money...our choice!!!
As you can see above - the first fellow is writing from New Brunswick and he thinks the Lower Churchill project is a Maritime issue and they would get taken in just like NL on the Upper Churchill.
The second fellow is writing as a Canadian - and he thinks the power is a Canadian Issue.
There are others like this on the page - the Maritimes and even a writer from Quebec see the Lower Churchill project as theirs. With the sale to Emera and the link to the Maritimes - it would appear we have already lost control of this last best resource.
Dunderdale appears happy enough to be getting attention from her "colleagues". What a joke this is. Kathy Dunderdale is not able to achieve the best deal for this project so she must be told by the people of Newfoundland and Labrador to stop.
The CBC story begins with this paragraph:
New England governors are calling for a swift resolution to transmission and financial issues associated with the potential development of Labrador's Lower Churchill hydroelectric project, with one warning that Canada is "running out of time" to sell power south of the border. (emphasis added)
This is more than alarming - this is ridiculous. Canada is not running out of time for anything - they do not own the power. Further this haste required by New England is nothing more than do it now or we will not allow you to give away your power.
So if things are so desperate for power - should be a big call to use it in Labrador for industry - right?
Stop this giveaway of our resource!
Clock ticking for hydro deals, Canada told
Comment 1New England is just trying to hoodwink the maritimes, just as quebec hoodwinked Nfld. Take your time and get the correct and profitable price, Preferably for a short term contract, so we can gouge the snot out of them as they become more reliant. We can get our soft lumber settlement out of the crooks yet. We have to start taking care of our own backyard before we worry or get pressured by the arrogance of the yanks.
Comment 2
why don't the americans put their money where their mouths are!!! this is a canadian issue, and the yanks have no place sticking their two cents in. if they weren't such energy hogs, they wouldn't be in an energy crisis, would they?! our project, our money...our choice!!!
As you can see above - the first fellow is writing from New Brunswick and he thinks the Lower Churchill project is a Maritime issue and they would get taken in just like NL on the Upper Churchill.
The second fellow is writing as a Canadian - and he thinks the power is a Canadian Issue.
There are others like this on the page - the Maritimes and even a writer from Quebec see the Lower Churchill project as theirs. With the sale to Emera and the link to the Maritimes - it would appear we have already lost control of this last best resource.
Dunderdale appears happy enough to be getting attention from her "colleagues". What a joke this is. Kathy Dunderdale is not able to achieve the best deal for this project so she must be told by the people of Newfoundland and Labrador to stop.
The CBC story begins with this paragraph:
New England governors are calling for a swift resolution to transmission and financial issues associated with the potential development of Labrador's Lower Churchill hydroelectric project, with one warning that Canada is "running out of time" to sell power south of the border. (emphasis added)
This is more than alarming - this is ridiculous. Canada is not running out of time for anything - they do not own the power. Further this haste required by New England is nothing more than do it now or we will not allow you to give away your power.
So if things are so desperate for power - should be a big call to use it in Labrador for industry - right?
Stop this giveaway of our resource!
Friday, May 20, 2011
The Argument Dunderdale will use to Privatize Hydro and Wikileaks connection.
Thanks to Wikileaks!
We all remember Hydro-Quebec's bid to purchase New Brunswick Power right?
Below is a Wikileak note: It outlines a discussion between Quebec Premier Jean Charest and U.S. Ambassador David Jacobson.
"Charest also told the Ambassador that HydroQu????bec (sic) is planning to acquire the privately-owned Prince Edward Island power company," the document reads.
"The generating assets involved are quite small, but Charest said HydroQu????bec (sic) would be also acquiring important wind assets and environmental credits."
So the idea was to acquire all that is power in New Brunswick and PEI - now what to do with Newfoundland and Labrador? The answer to that is Emera - in the case of NB Power it was crown owned and PEI (Fortis) not as attractive without the NB deal.
Emera is the easy way in for Hydro-Quebec - and I believe they will take it.
Further the mess that Dunderdale will put Nalcor in with the giveaway deal on the Lower Churchill - will lead to an argument to privatize Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro to unburden us from the debt. Fortis will be there to pick up the pieces with Hydro-Quebec and NL will be left with nothing other than very high electric bills.
I trust Senator Beth Marshall is working on that loan guarantee from Ottawa - will that in any way help Fortis? Fortis very strong on nothing to do with Lower Churchill - no not upfront - what may happen after Emera enters?
Possibility exists that Fortis and Hydro-Quebec could own the whole works.
You never underestimate companies and rich shareholders who want more. They are very clever.
We all remember Hydro-Quebec's bid to purchase New Brunswick Power right?
Below is a Wikileak note: It outlines a discussion between Quebec Premier Jean Charest and U.S. Ambassador David Jacobson.
"Charest also told the Ambassador that HydroQu????bec (sic) is planning to acquire the privately-owned Prince Edward Island power company," the document reads.
"The generating assets involved are quite small, but Charest said HydroQu????bec (sic) would be also acquiring important wind assets and environmental credits."
So the idea was to acquire all that is power in New Brunswick and PEI - now what to do with Newfoundland and Labrador? The answer to that is Emera - in the case of NB Power it was crown owned and PEI (Fortis) not as attractive without the NB deal.
Emera is the easy way in for Hydro-Quebec - and I believe they will take it.
Further the mess that Dunderdale will put Nalcor in with the giveaway deal on the Lower Churchill - will lead to an argument to privatize Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro to unburden us from the debt. Fortis will be there to pick up the pieces with Hydro-Quebec and NL will be left with nothing other than very high electric bills.
I trust Senator Beth Marshall is working on that loan guarantee from Ottawa - will that in any way help Fortis? Fortis very strong on nothing to do with Lower Churchill - no not upfront - what may happen after Emera enters?
Possibility exists that Fortis and Hydro-Quebec could own the whole works.
You never underestimate companies and rich shareholders who want more. They are very clever.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Why Chantal Hebert said of Harper "many voters...be wary of....promises..."
From the CBC
Members of the Nova Scotia legislature voted unanimously Thursday in favor of a resolution condemning Stephen Harper, the leader of the Canadian Alliance.
The resolution was in response to Harper's comments that there is a "defeatist attitude" in Atlantic Canada.
From the National Post
Williams, who has launched an “Anything-but-Conservative” campaign to defeat Harper’s MPs, warned Canadians of “dire consequences” if they give the Conservative leader a majority government.
“I beg you and plead with you today to stop and think and decide if that is what this country deserves,” Williams told a group of business leaders in a televised address in St. John’s, N.L. “If you believe this country deserves better, then you know what to do — it’s as easy as ABC.”
From the CBC
Harper promised compensation 'in error,' minister says
Prentice now says his party made a mistake and didn't have all the facts when it made the original commitment. That means the court-approved settlement deal that would pay some 80,000 former residential school students an average of about $25,000 each won't apply.
From The Star and Chantal Hebert
How much is Stephen Harper's word worth? In the wake of the Prime Minister's stunning reversal on income trusts this week, many voters will understandably be wary of taking anything he promises at face value in the future. After all, it is the second time in less than a year that Harper broke his word in a spectacular fashion.
From the CBC in 2008
Members of the Nova Scotia legislature voted unanimously Thursday in favor of a resolution condemning Stephen Harper, the leader of the Canadian Alliance.
The resolution was in response to Harper's comments that there is a "defeatist attitude" in Atlantic Canada.
"There is a dependence in the region that breeds a culture of defeatism," the Opposition leader said Wednesday following question period in the House.
From the National Post
Williams, who has launched an “Anything-but-Conservative” campaign to defeat Harper’s MPs, warned Canadians of “dire consequences” if they give the Conservative leader a majority government.
“I beg you and plead with you today to stop and think and decide if that is what this country deserves,” Williams told a group of business leaders in a televised address in St. John’s, N.L. “If you believe this country deserves better, then you know what to do — it’s as easy as ABC.”
From the CBC
Harper promised compensation 'in error,' minister says
Prentice now says his party made a mistake and didn't have all the facts when it made the original commitment. That means the court-approved settlement deal that would pay some 80,000 former residential school students an average of about $25,000 each won't apply.
From The Star and Chantal Hebert
How much is Stephen Harper's word worth? In the wake of the Prime Minister's stunning reversal on income trusts this week, many voters will understandably be wary of taking anything he promises at face value in the future. After all, it is the second time in less than a year that Harper broke his word in a spectacular fashion.
From the CBC in 2008
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he won't be breaking his promise to Canadians if he calls an election this fall, a year ahead of the fixed date set by his own government.
Friday, April 01, 2011
By the Company he Keeps - Williams - back on Safe and Familiar ground!
Story out of NB Business Journal today
SAINT JOHN - It may have been one of the worst-kept secrets in New Brunswick, but the rumours are true: Donald Trump is coming to the Port City.
The American business magnate and billionaire television personality will headline a special event this fall organized by the same young businessman who brought Richard Branson to Moncton last year.
Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Newfoundland premier Danny Williams will also speak at Spark, a motivational event to be held at Harbour Station on Oct. 6.
... Williams, who ended a seven-year run as Newfoundland's premier in December as one of the most popular Canadian politicians, will add the Atlantic Canadian flare to the event, LeBlanc said.
Williams is also a wealthy business titan who has developed one of the largest communications companies in Atlantic Canada.
The article continues....
But will he be back to Newfoundland and Labrador to prevent the Dunderdale sellout to Harper? Will he open his mouth as a passionate Newfoundlander and Labradorian or will he - as he accused Harper of being - turn out to be a political fraud?
Will he show up in New Brunswick and speak of the wonderful Emera deal and how "great" it is for Nova Scotia and New Brunswick? It certainly is not good for us.
Will he watch his PC's fall in disgrace - come October?
SAINT JOHN - It may have been one of the worst-kept secrets in New Brunswick, but the rumours are true: Donald Trump is coming to the Port City.
The American business magnate and billionaire television personality will headline a special event this fall organized by the same young businessman who brought Richard Branson to Moncton last year.
Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Newfoundland premier Danny Williams will also speak at Spark, a motivational event to be held at Harbour Station on Oct. 6.
... Williams, who ended a seven-year run as Newfoundland's premier in December as one of the most popular Canadian politicians, will add the Atlantic Canadian flare to the event, LeBlanc said.
Williams is also a wealthy business titan who has developed one of the largest communications companies in Atlantic Canada.
The article continues....
But will he be back to Newfoundland and Labrador to prevent the Dunderdale sellout to Harper? Will he open his mouth as a passionate Newfoundlander and Labradorian or will he - as he accused Harper of being - turn out to be a political fraud?
Will he show up in New Brunswick and speak of the wonderful Emera deal and how "great" it is for Nova Scotia and New Brunswick? It certainly is not good for us.
Will he watch his PC's fall in disgrace - come October?
Monday, March 21, 2011
Crowning the Destruction of our Future Speech from the Throne
From the throne speech today the following quotes: and Sue's Blog response to them.
Throne Speech quote: Newfoundland and Labrador took a giant leap forward in harnessing our power to grow with the announcement on the 18th of November to develop the hydroelectricity potential of Muskrat Falls – Phase One of the Lower Churchill River Project, one of the most attractive clean energy projects in North America.
Sue's Blog response: There is no doubt this government is putting a harness on our power to grow. In fact they are preventing us from growing - period. Instead of saying harnessing our hydro power so we can grow - she says we need to harness our power to grow. In other words putting the reins on our growth. We stay stagnant. And by the way what do you mean the announcement to develop? Is it a done deal? I thought it was a term sheet?
Throne Speech quote: What’s more, Muskrat Falls will mean consumers’ electricity bills will be stable for years to come, and lower than if the Province had chosen the alternative: a future dependent on more thermal generation and exposure to volatile oil prices.
Sue's Blog response: So if we are making no power available for industry in Labrador or Newfoundland what will industry rely on for growth in our province? Volatile oil prices? Why can't we attract energy hungry industry to our province with hydro - if what Dunderdale says is true?
Throne Speech quote: It has the potential to transform Newfoundland and Labrador from a jurisdiction dependent for much of its electricity on nonrenewable oil to a jurisdiction whose electricity system is 98 per cent carbon free. This project is the lowest-cost, long-term option to meet our growing electricity demand.
Sue's Blog response: If there is a growing energy demand - where is it and what is it for? If it was for industry we would not be shipping this superior energy to Nova Scotia and beyond for their industrial growth. Remember now we already ship out over 5000 MW's of hydro power enough to power Newfoundland and Labrador including the addition of several large industrial customers. Please provide breakdown of our current power mix.
Throne Speech quote: If we are to avoid those nasty consequences and keep our province on the path to sustainable growth, we need to shift from costly, nonrenewable oil-generated electricity to renewable clean energy, and we need to do it soon.
Sue's Blog response: We have been able to shift for years and particularly in Labrador - if we are going to attract industry we cannot afford to export power to our competitors in other provinces. The amount of power the Premier speaks of is getting enough to shut down Holyrood - not grow and do nothing in Labrador - once again even though as she says it it the "best" power.
Throne Speech quote: The Gull Island Project has a capacity to generate an additional 2,250 megawatts of hydroelectricity, and together, these two pieces of the Lower Churchill Project will generate bountiful energy to fuel industrial growth in Labrador.
Sue's Blog response: This is perhaps the most insulting thing I have ever seen said toward Labrador and her people. The Premier must know there are already over 5000 MW's of this clean renewable power already flowing out of Labrador and now she wants to do even more - on a "promise" that Labrador can have some next time. How is the giveaway of Muskrat Falls to other provinces and states going to help Labrador promote industry? She is giving away our advantage. This project is for the benefit of other provinces and Emera shareholders.
Throne Speech quote: Indeed, the development of both Gull Island and Muskrat Falls will be a great enabler for future opportunities in Labrador and will greatly improve Labrador’s ability to attract industrial development in the region.
Sue's Blog response: "greatly improve" Labrador's chance to attract industry? The Premier is giving it to other provinces. How does that help Labrador? Answer this: if the Muskrat Falls project is viable including extremely costly links to connect the power to the Island and Nova Scotia - how attractive would the power be if you just plugged in up there - without those costs? Premier - Labrador has already given over 5000 MW's of power away - how much more do they give away before they see industry? This is a joke.
Throne Speech Quote: And by 2041, just three decades from now, Newfoundland and Labrador will be released from the draconian provisions of the infamous Upper Churchill Contract and able to turn that energy to our own advantage.
Sue's Blog response: What? Just three decades from now? Another 30 years after generation and generation suffered - just a few more the Premier says? Her government promised to get redress to the Upper Churchill before the development of the Lower Churchill - did they lie? And now what we have to wait for another 30 years for the Emera deal to expire? They honestly treat our people as fools - for what so some shareholders can make a killing again off our resources?
Throne Speech quote: What’s more, the agreement with Emera provides Newfoundland and Labrador, for the first time in our history, with a link to consumers in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and New England, firmly establishing Newfoundland and Labrador as a clean-energy superpower in northeastern North America. This project is unequivocally in the best interests of the people of Newfoundland and Labrador.
Sue's Blog response: This is the most ludicrous statement in the speech. Somehow driving the "best" power out of our province to the other jurisdictions she mentions is somehow in our best interests? We will become a clean-energy superpower she says. If we were that - we would be attracting industry to use the energy - then we would be a superpower. If the energy is all gone out - what will we get from being a superpower. Quebec is a superpower - they are blocked with industry from the use of hydro power including Labrador's Upper Churchill.
This is just a sample of the inept, visionless, and dangerous thinking of this Premier, the former Premier and the PC's in the House of Assembly. It is almost laughable - the heights to which one will go to get money to shareholders - at the cost of societal advancement. This is the worst proposed deal ever seen on the Lower Churchill and should never see the light of day.
To top it all off - Emera can be purchased by Hydro-Quebec - that will be some thirty year haul.
Throne Speech quote: Newfoundland and Labrador took a giant leap forward in harnessing our power to grow with the announcement on the 18th of November to develop the hydroelectricity potential of Muskrat Falls – Phase One of the Lower Churchill River Project, one of the most attractive clean energy projects in North America.
Sue's Blog response: There is no doubt this government is putting a harness on our power to grow. In fact they are preventing us from growing - period. Instead of saying harnessing our hydro power so we can grow - she says we need to harness our power to grow. In other words putting the reins on our growth. We stay stagnant. And by the way what do you mean the announcement to develop? Is it a done deal? I thought it was a term sheet?
Throne Speech quote: What’s more, Muskrat Falls will mean consumers’ electricity bills will be stable for years to come, and lower than if the Province had chosen the alternative: a future dependent on more thermal generation and exposure to volatile oil prices.
Sue's Blog response: So if we are making no power available for industry in Labrador or Newfoundland what will industry rely on for growth in our province? Volatile oil prices? Why can't we attract energy hungry industry to our province with hydro - if what Dunderdale says is true?
Throne Speech quote: It has the potential to transform Newfoundland and Labrador from a jurisdiction dependent for much of its electricity on nonrenewable oil to a jurisdiction whose electricity system is 98 per cent carbon free. This project is the lowest-cost, long-term option to meet our growing electricity demand.
Sue's Blog response: If there is a growing energy demand - where is it and what is it for? If it was for industry we would not be shipping this superior energy to Nova Scotia and beyond for their industrial growth. Remember now we already ship out over 5000 MW's of hydro power enough to power Newfoundland and Labrador including the addition of several large industrial customers. Please provide breakdown of our current power mix.
Throne Speech quote: If we are to avoid those nasty consequences and keep our province on the path to sustainable growth, we need to shift from costly, nonrenewable oil-generated electricity to renewable clean energy, and we need to do it soon.
Sue's Blog response: We have been able to shift for years and particularly in Labrador - if we are going to attract industry we cannot afford to export power to our competitors in other provinces. The amount of power the Premier speaks of is getting enough to shut down Holyrood - not grow and do nothing in Labrador - once again even though as she says it it the "best" power.
Throne Speech quote: The Gull Island Project has a capacity to generate an additional 2,250 megawatts of hydroelectricity, and together, these two pieces of the Lower Churchill Project will generate bountiful energy to fuel industrial growth in Labrador.
Sue's Blog response: This is perhaps the most insulting thing I have ever seen said toward Labrador and her people. The Premier must know there are already over 5000 MW's of this clean renewable power already flowing out of Labrador and now she wants to do even more - on a "promise" that Labrador can have some next time. How is the giveaway of Muskrat Falls to other provinces and states going to help Labrador promote industry? She is giving away our advantage. This project is for the benefit of other provinces and Emera shareholders.
Throne Speech quote: Indeed, the development of both Gull Island and Muskrat Falls will be a great enabler for future opportunities in Labrador and will greatly improve Labrador’s ability to attract industrial development in the region.
Sue's Blog response: "greatly improve" Labrador's chance to attract industry? The Premier is giving it to other provinces. How does that help Labrador? Answer this: if the Muskrat Falls project is viable including extremely costly links to connect the power to the Island and Nova Scotia - how attractive would the power be if you just plugged in up there - without those costs? Premier - Labrador has already given over 5000 MW's of power away - how much more do they give away before they see industry? This is a joke.
Throne Speech Quote: And by 2041, just three decades from now, Newfoundland and Labrador will be released from the draconian provisions of the infamous Upper Churchill Contract and able to turn that energy to our own advantage.
Sue's Blog response: What? Just three decades from now? Another 30 years after generation and generation suffered - just a few more the Premier says? Her government promised to get redress to the Upper Churchill before the development of the Lower Churchill - did they lie? And now what we have to wait for another 30 years for the Emera deal to expire? They honestly treat our people as fools - for what so some shareholders can make a killing again off our resources?
Throne Speech quote: What’s more, the agreement with Emera provides Newfoundland and Labrador, for the first time in our history, with a link to consumers in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and New England, firmly establishing Newfoundland and Labrador as a clean-energy superpower in northeastern North America. This project is unequivocally in the best interests of the people of Newfoundland and Labrador.
Sue's Blog response: This is the most ludicrous statement in the speech. Somehow driving the "best" power out of our province to the other jurisdictions she mentions is somehow in our best interests? We will become a clean-energy superpower she says. If we were that - we would be attracting industry to use the energy - then we would be a superpower. If the energy is all gone out - what will we get from being a superpower. Quebec is a superpower - they are blocked with industry from the use of hydro power including Labrador's Upper Churchill.
This is just a sample of the inept, visionless, and dangerous thinking of this Premier, the former Premier and the PC's in the House of Assembly. It is almost laughable - the heights to which one will go to get money to shareholders - at the cost of societal advancement. This is the worst proposed deal ever seen on the Lower Churchill and should never see the light of day.
To top it all off - Emera can be purchased by Hydro-Quebec - that will be some thirty year haul.
Friday, March 04, 2011
You want to debate the Emera project Kathy? Ed? Shawn? Are you sure?
 |
| WHAT DOES THIS MEAN TO YOU? |
When we talk about sending out raw energy versus refined product - in the case of oil and gas and in the case of using hydro-power for industry - we might start to recognize some very strange things. That is - strange to Premier Dunderdale, Minister Shawn Skinner and the rest of the geniuses on the hill.
Just curious Newfoundland and Labrador - how is it that New Brunswick is ahead of this province in exports? We do all realize the resources we have - right? Oil, gas, fishery, hydropower, forestry, iron ore, nickel, and others. Now what do we have to show for it in value? Look at New Brunswick - they don't have our oil, our 5000 MW's, our fishery, not even minerals in such quantities and quality such as iron ore and nickel.
You want the answer?
The opening of the Saint John LNG regasification plant in September 2009 will provide a significant boost to exports in both 2010 and 2011, as production ramps up and industrial production in New England recovers. However, most of the increase in energy export earnings this year will be due to higher prices for refined petroleum products, as the price of crude rises to an average of USD 77/brl in 2010 from USD 62 in 2009.
Oh my - we have the oil right? They refine it right? What we need to do now - according to Ed Martin, Shawn Skinner, and Premier Dunderdale is to ship them some more cheap reliable renewable power. That should help them pick up some more industrial development - maybe they can refine and process more resources. Anything else the gang would like to give them?
WE GOT IT - WE GOT IT yep we got it all right. So are we allowed to refine our own oil and gas yet? No that's right it actually belongs to Canada - we can have royalties which Ottawa can then strip back - and oh yes - that's right New Brunswick and Quebec would have to exceed their refining capacity in order for us to be able to. Or is it that Irving controls that roost?
Well then in the name of growing a strong Atlantic Canada - the least we could do is throw some of that unrefined energy (that is we don't plug it into anything here) over to Nova Scotia - with any luck the Minister of Natural Resources of Newfoundland and Labrador can be hailed as the fellow who helped Nova Scotia along with it's lagging exports.
While we are at it - that much bashed (by Canada lovers) Iceland - the home to 250,000 souls - as Shawn Skinner would say - is looking at exports exceeding 5 billion - a billion of which for seafood - the majority of which is ground fish. Very healthy Atlantic cod stocks. You got to love the nice exports of aluminum. They are humming away - plugging in every industry they can attract with hydro power. Their exports are up 21% in January over the same period last year.
Not to worry because Newfoundland and Labrador has the fish right? Well no - we are third behind British Columbia and Nova Scotia - oh yeah that's right - the king cod is lost in Ottawa somewhere and we are missing a billion dollars a year. Shawn get that power to Nova Scotia quick - with our fisheries planning they are going to have to increase processing in that province - just as soon as our people are forced out.
BRITISH COLUMBIA:
- Canada’s top exporter of fish and seafood, valued at $882.8 million.
- Exported 162,834 tonnes (t) of fish and seafood products.
- The three most valuable species exported by this province were farmed Atlantic salmon (49,543 t valued at $330.9 million), herring (3,470 t valued at $57.6 million), and crab (5,862 t valued at $54.5 million).
- Canada’s second leading exporter of fish and seafood, valued at $809.7 million.
- Exported 111,454 t of fish and seafood products.
- The three most valuable species exported by this province were lobster (23,065 t valued at $353.8 million), scallops (4,946 t valued at $88.4 million), and snow/queen crab (8,519 t valued at $72.8 million).
- Canada’s third leading exporter of fish and seafood, valued at $720.5 million.
- Exported 167,691 t of fish and seafood products.
- The three most valuable species exported by this province were snow/queen crab (31,571 t valued at $270.3 million), shrimp/prawn (52,384 t valued at $191.1 million), and mackerel (22,981 t valued at $37.2 million)
Now if we really try we can help out our "have not" partners in Ontario - they are planning to lead export growth driven by the automotive sector. How did that happen? Oh yeah we "bailed out" that sector after corporate fraud just about crushed the markets - from the USA outwards. They could really use our power and with any luck - we can help them get back to the "have side".
Maybe Ontario can get to experience a 12.4% unemployment rate instead of that backward 8% or even worse Iceland's 7%.
Ed Martin called the Lower Churchill "low hanging fruit" in Ontario - I guess he meant it.
You wonder why - I sit and scratch my head - at our government's insistence at getting the power out of Labrador at all costs? This valuable resource that means industrial advantage - only if we keep it here. If Ed Martin is right and Canada will be short 14,400 MW's of power by 2030 - this Lower Churchill power should be kept in Labrador at all costs. Just curious Ed - why is so much more power going to be needed? Increase in Canadian population and industry? How much of that growth are you predicting for this province? Oh - you must not be predicting growth for here - you did not say we would be short - that means we would have to attract significant industry which would attract back home significant Newfoundlanders and Labradorians that left to find WORK.
I would like to see our exports increase significantly in the fourth quarter - I have dozens of politicians available to be shipped to your jurisdiction. Any takers?
Thursday, February 03, 2011
There are good PC MHA's on the Hill and they need to Act on Churchill
- got a message from Sarah - who if she's reading this needs to attach her email so I can return her message -
Here's the test of a good project for a natural renewable resource development - unlike what Steve Kent leads you to believe on person-years of employment - it relies on full benefits forever.
You see the proposal here does offer employment - just like its predecessor the Upper Churchill - it has to the infrastructure is massive. That's where the benefits stop and the giveaway begins.
First: financing for the project -oh yeah you and me and escalating power bills.
Who is doing that financing and how much will they make? What will you and I pay for the privilege of shipping out our wealth and Labrador's potential for industrial development?
When developing hydro-electric power - one must consider the environmental impacts of such a development and whether or not that impact can be justified by socio-economic benefits. There must also be consideration for what the power is being developed for and whether or not at the end of that assessment - that Labrador particularly will continue to benefit from not only power sales but permanent jobs from industry plugged into the power. All advanced societies develop hydro developments for that purpose. NOBODY gives away this power potential without first advancing significant industrial developments and a reduction of fossil fuels in the development region and reducing the cost to domestic consumers (you and me). That is the model which we know as Hydro-Quebec. Make no mistake - they are the most progressive and successful energy company in the world. This is measurable amounts due from the Upper Churchill development.
Newfoundland and Labrador has significant energy potentials - natural gas, oil, wind, wave, tidal, peat, and of course hydro-electric both small and large scale projects.
Which ones do we prefer to export? All of them if we have enough hydro-electric power - which we do - unless these PC Cabinet Ministers go ahead with this legacy of shame.
Wind is something like aquaculture - still developing - still with problems...
Wind also needs to be backed up by reliable sources - which makes it great for export - that is we can ship it while it is producing. We cannot rely on it for domestic uses - it is not as reliable as hydro-electric and it is more expensive. There are also real concerns as to where these costs will be going and also that most developments are by the private sector - which is not preferable for energy domestically as it is an essential product. That is why we continue to own Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro.
We have failed if we do not accomplish the following:
1. Employment - virtually all by Newfoundlanders and Labradorians with emphasis on Labradorians.
2. Newfoundland and Labrador retain ownership of the resource and project.
3. Hydroelectric power the entire province particularly all of Labrador for domestic purposes.
4. 90% of energy produced from large scale projects such as the Lower Churchill be used to fuel industry in the region where it is produced.
5. Offset environmental effects using every means possible.
6. Achieve federal support for the project as partners - wherein we utilize federal funds for financing - similar to the Hibernia arrangement - with the exception that we do not pay it back - but accept it as partial payment for the lost ground fish resources.
Wind energy to be developed should be exported at market prices as well as other non-renewable potentials. Wave and tidal power potentials should be researched and developed by Nalcor for future growth and export potentials.
I will further explain to PC mha's the following - not difficult - the fuel that drives hydro-electric power is free - it is water - the fuel that drives thermal generation is not free and volatile, oil gas coal. Which one should we use for our domestic and industrial use? The answer is very simple.
Wind although arguably a good source of renewable energy does have problems with reliability, storage, and continued infrastructure costs. One must also remember how many turbines it would take to generate 700- 1000 megs of power needed for an aluminum smelter. In either case you have to back it up with another source.
This is just the beginning of the assessment and we will have to explore fully the role of the proposed partners, the gouging expected by the private sector. The vulnerability to Quebec as the proposed partner, Emera is a publicly traded company and open to takeover - hostile or other.
The examination of what it will mean to the future of our province - particularly Labrador as we continue to export and giveaway our best industrial advantage.
Then for getting nothing, giving it all away, and ruining our potential - we as consumers will see astronomical increases in our light bills. The same thing was anticipated when we proposed to sell Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro.
Last but not least - Labrador communities will remain unconnected and reliant on either Hydro-Quebec or thermal generation for domestic power - while Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, maybe Ontario and New England States get their hands on our cheap renewable hydro power - that for some reason they can find industry to use.
Back to the basic equation - Hydro development costs + transmission + loss of energy through transmission + maintenance + marketing + administration + profit = affordable power that Nova Scotia can attract industry with.
While Hydro development costs + minimum transmission + virtually no loss of energy through transmission = more than affordable power - deliverable in Labrador to industry that our incompetent politicians cannot attract.
Without a doubt - this is a giveaway - the same as the Upper Churchill except this one will be more expensive for us. This would be a legacy of shame that these PC MHA's would have to live with as their grandchildren ask the whys.
Liberal MHA's eventually took Clyde Wells on and advised the Premier that the sale of Hydro was not acceptable. Now these PC's must look within and do the right thing - before they leave public life.
Without a doubt this is not a good deal and there will be no excuses for those who would allow this to happen this time.
Here's the test of a good project for a natural renewable resource development - unlike what Steve Kent leads you to believe on person-years of employment - it relies on full benefits forever.
You see the proposal here does offer employment - just like its predecessor the Upper Churchill - it has to the infrastructure is massive. That's where the benefits stop and the giveaway begins.
First: financing for the project -oh yeah you and me and escalating power bills.
Who is doing that financing and how much will they make? What will you and I pay for the privilege of shipping out our wealth and Labrador's potential for industrial development?
When developing hydro-electric power - one must consider the environmental impacts of such a development and whether or not that impact can be justified by socio-economic benefits. There must also be consideration for what the power is being developed for and whether or not at the end of that assessment - that Labrador particularly will continue to benefit from not only power sales but permanent jobs from industry plugged into the power. All advanced societies develop hydro developments for that purpose. NOBODY gives away this power potential without first advancing significant industrial developments and a reduction of fossil fuels in the development region and reducing the cost to domestic consumers (you and me). That is the model which we know as Hydro-Quebec. Make no mistake - they are the most progressive and successful energy company in the world. This is measurable amounts due from the Upper Churchill development.
Newfoundland and Labrador has significant energy potentials - natural gas, oil, wind, wave, tidal, peat, and of course hydro-electric both small and large scale projects.
Which ones do we prefer to export? All of them if we have enough hydro-electric power - which we do - unless these PC Cabinet Ministers go ahead with this legacy of shame.
Wind is something like aquaculture - still developing - still with problems...
Wind also needs to be backed up by reliable sources - which makes it great for export - that is we can ship it while it is producing. We cannot rely on it for domestic uses - it is not as reliable as hydro-electric and it is more expensive. There are also real concerns as to where these costs will be going and also that most developments are by the private sector - which is not preferable for energy domestically as it is an essential product. That is why we continue to own Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro.
We have failed if we do not accomplish the following:
1. Employment - virtually all by Newfoundlanders and Labradorians with emphasis on Labradorians.
2. Newfoundland and Labrador retain ownership of the resource and project.
3. Hydroelectric power the entire province particularly all of Labrador for domestic purposes.
4. 90% of energy produced from large scale projects such as the Lower Churchill be used to fuel industry in the region where it is produced.
5. Offset environmental effects using every means possible.
6. Achieve federal support for the project as partners - wherein we utilize federal funds for financing - similar to the Hibernia arrangement - with the exception that we do not pay it back - but accept it as partial payment for the lost ground fish resources.
Wind energy to be developed should be exported at market prices as well as other non-renewable potentials. Wave and tidal power potentials should be researched and developed by Nalcor for future growth and export potentials.
I will further explain to PC mha's the following - not difficult - the fuel that drives hydro-electric power is free - it is water - the fuel that drives thermal generation is not free and volatile, oil gas coal. Which one should we use for our domestic and industrial use? The answer is very simple.
Wind although arguably a good source of renewable energy does have problems with reliability, storage, and continued infrastructure costs. One must also remember how many turbines it would take to generate 700- 1000 megs of power needed for an aluminum smelter. In either case you have to back it up with another source.
This is just the beginning of the assessment and we will have to explore fully the role of the proposed partners, the gouging expected by the private sector. The vulnerability to Quebec as the proposed partner, Emera is a publicly traded company and open to takeover - hostile or other.
The examination of what it will mean to the future of our province - particularly Labrador as we continue to export and giveaway our best industrial advantage.
Then for getting nothing, giving it all away, and ruining our potential - we as consumers will see astronomical increases in our light bills. The same thing was anticipated when we proposed to sell Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro.
Last but not least - Labrador communities will remain unconnected and reliant on either Hydro-Quebec or thermal generation for domestic power - while Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, maybe Ontario and New England States get their hands on our cheap renewable hydro power - that for some reason they can find industry to use.
Back to the basic equation - Hydro development costs + transmission + loss of energy through transmission + maintenance + marketing + administration + profit = affordable power that Nova Scotia can attract industry with.
While Hydro development costs + minimum transmission + virtually no loss of energy through transmission = more than affordable power - deliverable in Labrador to industry that our incompetent politicians cannot attract.
Without a doubt - this is a giveaway - the same as the Upper Churchill except this one will be more expensive for us. This would be a legacy of shame that these PC MHA's would have to live with as their grandchildren ask the whys.
Liberal MHA's eventually took Clyde Wells on and advised the Premier that the sale of Hydro was not acceptable. Now these PC's must look within and do the right thing - before they leave public life.
Without a doubt this is not a good deal and there will be no excuses for those who would allow this to happen this time.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Imagine that - the more we giveaway the richer Emera shareholders become
Emera's Labrador power deal a "game changer"...
The following excerpt is from a Globe and Mail article November 2010
He said Emera would reap a windfall in transmission fees if Nalcor can sell its full surplus electricity into New Brunswick and the United States while its Nova Scotia Power subsidiary earns a guaranteed rate of return for selling 20 per cent of the power to its own customers. Nalcor and Emera expect that as much as 40 per cent of the 800-megawatt capacity for the Muskrat Falls development will be available for sale outside the two provinces.
Analysts expect Emera will see a boost to its earnings per share as a result of the deal. Petro Panarites of CIBC World Markets raised his target price for the company’s shares based on a higher earnings forecast, though he cautioned there are still hurdles before the success of the project can be guaranteed.
However, the success of the deal depends greatly on government climate change policies, and on the willingness of voters to absorb higher electricity prices as utilities phase out lower-cost coal- and oil-fired generation and replace it with hydro and other renewables.
Imagine that the more power and thereby industry we can dump into other jurisdictions the more of a windfall for Emera. I think the headline says it all. They already see their (Emera shareholders) future is that resource they call Labrador power. This deal will ruin the future potential for the next two generations of Newfoundlanders and Labradorians. The time for debate on this is now. We have several months to force this issue and we will. Each and every day more information will come out on the extent of this giveaway. This time we must say no and not sit back and wait for our grandchildren talk about this deal the same way our generation talks about the Upper Churchill deal.
On the Tory leadership debacle - the wrong is so obvious that we really must focus on what's important - not whether or not Kathy Dunderdale will personally and professionally prevail. When set against the backdrop of our children's future - frankly my dear I don't give a damn.
The following excerpt is from a Globe and Mail article November 2010
He said Emera would reap a windfall in transmission fees if Nalcor can sell its full surplus electricity into New Brunswick and the United States while its Nova Scotia Power subsidiary earns a guaranteed rate of return for selling 20 per cent of the power to its own customers. Nalcor and Emera expect that as much as 40 per cent of the 800-megawatt capacity for the Muskrat Falls development will be available for sale outside the two provinces.
Analysts expect Emera will see a boost to its earnings per share as a result of the deal. Petro Panarites of CIBC World Markets raised his target price for the company’s shares based on a higher earnings forecast, though he cautioned there are still hurdles before the success of the project can be guaranteed.
However, the success of the deal depends greatly on government climate change policies, and on the willingness of voters to absorb higher electricity prices as utilities phase out lower-cost coal- and oil-fired generation and replace it with hydro and other renewables.
Imagine that the more power and thereby industry we can dump into other jurisdictions the more of a windfall for Emera. I think the headline says it all. They already see their (Emera shareholders) future is that resource they call Labrador power. This deal will ruin the future potential for the next two generations of Newfoundlanders and Labradorians. The time for debate on this is now. We have several months to force this issue and we will. Each and every day more information will come out on the extent of this giveaway. This time we must say no and not sit back and wait for our grandchildren talk about this deal the same way our generation talks about the Upper Churchill deal.
On the Tory leadership debacle - the wrong is so obvious that we really must focus on what's important - not whether or not Kathy Dunderdale will personally and professionally prevail. When set against the backdrop of our children's future - frankly my dear I don't give a damn.
Friday, January 07, 2011
Do you believe Danny Williams?
Below you will see one part of a story by the Globe and Mail October 2009
Hydro-Québec's takeover of New Brunswick Power amounts to a virtual power monopoly in Eastern Canada and poses “a very dangerous situation” for the entire country, Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams warns.
The outspoken premier told The Globe and Mail Thursday that Hydro-Québec's “agenda” is to secure a stranglehold over access to electricity markets in the U.S.
If what Williams said then is in any way true - what are the odds that Hydro Quebec will go after Emera if a deal goes through on Lower Churchill development?
Hydro-Québec's takeover of New Brunswick Power amounts to a virtual power monopoly in Eastern Canada and poses “a very dangerous situation” for the entire country, Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams warns.
The outspoken premier told The Globe and Mail Thursday that Hydro-Québec's “agenda” is to secure a stranglehold over access to electricity markets in the U.S.
If what Williams said then is in any way true - what are the odds that Hydro Quebec will go after Emera if a deal goes through on Lower Churchill development?
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Keeping our eye on the ball...
On this day of oil frenzy - I am not commenting on until I see the meat - we must keep our eyes on the ball. Lower Churchill Power
First of all most of Sue's Blog readers know I am not a fan of Atlantica. This new corporate version of the 4 Atlantic Provinces - which best I can tell boosts Nova Scotia and New Brunswick first and foremost
Now the latest - seems Newfoundland Power has jumped into energy policy and the Lower Churchill by selling the concept of an Atlantic transmission line to Atlantica participants
Recently Atlantica (AIMS) held a conference where energy was discussed.
Here is what the Newfoundland Power representative said - according to Charles Cirtwill acting president of the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies.
Cirtwill then adds:
The proposed route for this energy would bring the power via undersea line from Labrador to Newfoundland and then from Newfoundland to New Brunswick. Yes, New Brunswick, not Nova Scotia – despite the fact that Nova Scotia is significantly closer to Newfoundland and that undersea power lines are very expensive. I was curious as to why, so I asked.
It turns out that, first off, "pancaking" of transmission rates (stacking one rate on top of another) would drive up the price of Lower Churchill electricity. Apparently, the longer undersea power line is cheaper than the pancaked rate of running through two provinces. Second, Nova Scotia has only a single connection to the continental grid, increasing the risk of service interruption due to breakdowns or maxing out the capacity of the existing infrastructure; whereas New Brunswick has just upgraded some of its linkages to the grid and is exploring how to do more.
These types of barriers are not only going to keep Lower Churchill electricity from travelling through Nova Scotia (and make it more expensive for consumers than it needs to be even if it goes through New Brunswick), they are also limiting the potential for further expansion of our own renewable energy projects. Proponents argue that the potential for Nova Scotia to become a centre of renewable energy is virtually limitless. They are quick to point out, for example, the innumerable potential locations for wind farms (locations that would not, by the way, require us to put one in Anne Murray’s, or anyone else’s, backyard).
The problem is, they have limited ability to ship the power off once they generate it; and even if they could send it along to market, pancaking and other inefficiencies guarantee them a higher cost product when it comes time to sell it to you and me.
First of all Atlantica is not real - however when AIMS makes such declarations we should be looking behind doors or under beds because a bogeyman is close. Cirtwill speaks of the Atlantica concept in such real terms - you and I are left to wonder why our Premier has not told us about the deal yet. Or whether Williams even knows the discussions are taking place in Halifax on Newfoundland and Labrador resources and the benefits it can bring other provinces and states.
This is however the hangover of presenting the Lower Churchill as an export project designed to help everybody else where their economies or environmental problems or industry woes. This type of talk - which is essentially other provinces divvying up our power before we develop it - is because Danny Williams will not treat this power potential with the same level of detail and protection "accorded" to oil and gas.
Now if all this is not enough - the Atlantica ghost held another preach-in called "Reaching Atlantica: Business Without Borders" 2006 in Saint John - New Brunswick.
According to a story in the Telegraph-Journal - Tim Curry director of the Atlantica Centre for Energy had this to say during that get-together:
Well you can't say it better than that - if you want manufacturing - smelters - heavy industry - you use power (energy) to attract them. If we export the Lower Churchill then what?
By the way what information does Newfoundland Power have on all the transmission route potentials - that we the people do not have. Will Fortis be the one to build and operate the transmission grid for exports? Is that the private sector Williams alluded to recently?
Clearly the discussion of Lower Churchill Power is very public and open in Ontario - New Brunswick - and Nova Scotia - not here! Clearly the only reason it is being discussed is the anticipation that other Provinces and States might get their hands on this superior renewable power supply.
And again - our media asks nothing.
If one wanted to be a dictator - there's no better place than Newfoundland and Labrador to fulfill that personal need for "power".
First of all most of Sue's Blog readers know I am not a fan of Atlantica. This new corporate version of the 4 Atlantic Provinces - which best I can tell boosts Nova Scotia and New Brunswick first and foremost
Now the latest - seems Newfoundland Power has jumped into energy policy and the Lower Churchill by selling the concept of an Atlantic transmission line to Atlantica participants
Recently Atlantica (AIMS) held a conference where energy was discussed.
Here is what the Newfoundland Power representative said - according to Charles Cirtwill acting president of the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies.
Newfoundland Power took that opportunity to outline the significant benefits of the Lower Churchill development. Access to the energy generated by this clean and renewable hydro-electric project could enable provinces and states throughout Atlantica (and beyond) to shift to lower-cost, reliable energy while taking off-line older, and arguably less clean, coal-fired generation capacity.
Cirtwill then adds:
The proposed route for this energy would bring the power via undersea line from Labrador to Newfoundland and then from Newfoundland to New Brunswick. Yes, New Brunswick, not Nova Scotia – despite the fact that Nova Scotia is significantly closer to Newfoundland and that undersea power lines are very expensive. I was curious as to why, so I asked.
It turns out that, first off, "pancaking" of transmission rates (stacking one rate on top of another) would drive up the price of Lower Churchill electricity. Apparently, the longer undersea power line is cheaper than the pancaked rate of running through two provinces. Second, Nova Scotia has only a single connection to the continental grid, increasing the risk of service interruption due to breakdowns or maxing out the capacity of the existing infrastructure; whereas New Brunswick has just upgraded some of its linkages to the grid and is exploring how to do more.
These types of barriers are not only going to keep Lower Churchill electricity from travelling through Nova Scotia (and make it more expensive for consumers than it needs to be even if it goes through New Brunswick), they are also limiting the potential for further expansion of our own renewable energy projects. Proponents argue that the potential for Nova Scotia to become a centre of renewable energy is virtually limitless. They are quick to point out, for example, the innumerable potential locations for wind farms (locations that would not, by the way, require us to put one in Anne Murray’s, or anyone else’s, backyard).
The problem is, they have limited ability to ship the power off once they generate it; and even if they could send it along to market, pancaking and other inefficiencies guarantee them a higher cost product when it comes time to sell it to you and me.
Atlantica isn’t just about ports and roads and bridges. Saint John is fast becoming an energy hub. Nova Scotia, indeed all of Atlantica, needs to be seriously exploring the potential of becoming a sustainable energy gateway.
First of all Atlantica is not real - however when AIMS makes such declarations we should be looking behind doors or under beds because a bogeyman is close. Cirtwill speaks of the Atlantica concept in such real terms - you and I are left to wonder why our Premier has not told us about the deal yet. Or whether Williams even knows the discussions are taking place in Halifax on Newfoundland and Labrador resources and the benefits it can bring other provinces and states.
This is however the hangover of presenting the Lower Churchill as an export project designed to help everybody else where their economies or environmental problems or industry woes. This type of talk - which is essentially other provinces divvying up our power before we develop it - is because Danny Williams will not treat this power potential with the same level of detail and protection "accorded" to oil and gas.
Now if all this is not enough - the Atlantica ghost held another preach-in called "Reaching Atlantica: Business Without Borders" 2006 in Saint John - New Brunswick.
According to a story in the Telegraph-Journal - Tim Curry director of the Atlantica Centre for Energy had this to say during that get-together:
"It's an energy age and people are going to be increasingly mindful about the diversity and security of energy sources.."
"It doesn't matter what you're doing. If you're going to plunk money down to build a manufacturing plant or any other business that is critically dependent on a source of energy, then you're going to look long and hard at the energy regime in the area where you are looking..."
"If you don't have both secure and diverse energy supplies, you're not going to invest. Not anymore."
Well you can't say it better than that - if you want manufacturing - smelters - heavy industry - you use power (energy) to attract them. If we export the Lower Churchill then what?
By the way what information does Newfoundland Power have on all the transmission route potentials - that we the people do not have. Will Fortis be the one to build and operate the transmission grid for exports? Is that the private sector Williams alluded to recently?
Clearly the discussion of Lower Churchill Power is very public and open in Ontario - New Brunswick - and Nova Scotia - not here! Clearly the only reason it is being discussed is the anticipation that other Provinces and States might get their hands on this superior renewable power supply.
And again - our media asks nothing.
If one wanted to be a dictator - there's no better place than Newfoundland and Labrador to fulfill that personal need for "power".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)